Internet DRAFT - draft-fujikawa-ipv6-src-addr-selection
draft-fujikawa-ipv6-src-addr-selection
Source Address Selection for IPv6 FUJIKAWA Kenji
Internet-Draft ROOT Inc.
Expires: August 25, 2008 February 2007
Source Address Selection Using Just Routing Information for IPv6
draft-fujikawa-ipv6-src-addr-selection-03.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 19, 2008.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
Abstract
This document describes a problem of source address selection Rule 8.
stated in RFC3484[RFC3484], and shows one solution, which is based
just on the destination based address routing and does not require
policy routing such as source address based routing.
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Source Address Selection for IPv6 July 2007
1. A Problem of at Source Address Selection Rule 8. in RFC3484
In RFC3484[RFC3404], the source address selection guidelines are
shown in the case of multihoming. However, according to them, a
problem occurs that a host cannot select the best path.
Rule 8 in 5. Source Address Selection in RFC3484 says:
Rule 8: Use longest matching prefix. If CommonPrefixLen(SA, D) >
CommonPrefixLen(SB, D), then prefer SA. Similarly, if
CommonPrefixLen(SB, D) > CommonPrefixLen(SA,D), then prefer SB.
Here, consider a network shown in Fig. 1.
+---+
|CN |
+-+-+
| 2001:db8:2001::CN
|
+---+---+2001:db8:2000:/36
| |
+---------+ ISP2 |
| | |
| +-------+
|
+---+---+2001:db8:1000:/36 +-------+2001:db8:3000::/36
| | | |
| ISP1 +-------------------+ ISP3 |
| | | |
+---+---+ +---+---+
| |
| |
+----------+ +---------+
2001:db8:1000:R | |2001:db8:3000:R
+-+-+ +-+-+
2001:db8:1001::/48|R1 | |R3 |2001:db8:3001::/48
+-+-+ +-+-+
fe80::R1| |fe80:R3
| |
--+---+---+--
2001:db8:1001:1:EN | 2001:db8:3001:1:EN
+-+-+
|EN |
+---+
Fig. 1
In Fig. 1,
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Source Address Selection for IPv6 July 2007
- Each of ISP1, ISP2, and ISP3 is assigned an address space,
2001:db8:1000::/36, 2001:db8:2000::/36, and 2001:db8:3000::/36,
respectively.
- Correspondent node CN belongs to ISP2, and is assigned an
address 2001:db8:2001::CN.
- The site is multihomed to ISP1 and ISP3, and the routers R1 and
R2 distributes address spaces to downstream nodes such as
2001:db8:1001::/48 and 2001:db8:3001::/48.
- End node EN is assigned two addresses, 2001:db8:1001:1:EN and
2001:db8:3001:1:EN.
Here, in the above IPv6 address notation, CN, R1, R2, and EN
indicates 64bit Interface ID's.
According to Rule 8, by means of the longest match method,
2001:db8:3001:EN is selected as the source address of a packet
directed from CN to EN. Therefore,
- For the purpose of avoiding the source address filtering,
policy routing or etc. is required in order to direct a packet to
ISP3.
- The route becomes roundabout passing through ISP3.
2. A Solution Using Just the Information of the Destination Address of
Packets
Here, one of the solutions of the above problem is shown, which is
based on the traditional destination address based routing, that is,
does not require policy routing such as source address based routing.
This approach is separated into two issues, an management issue and
implementation issue.
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Source Address Selection for IPv6 July 2007
2.1 Management Issue
+---+
|CN |
+-+-+
| 2001:db8:2001::CN
|
+---+---+2001:db8:2000:/36
| |
+---------+ ISP2 |
| | |
| +-------+
|
+---+---+2001:db8:1000:/36 +-------+2001:db8:3000::/36
| | | |
| ISP1 +-------------------+ ISP3 |
| | | |
+---+---+ +---+---+
| |
| |
+----------+ +---------+
2001:db8:1000:R | |2001:db8:3000:R
+-+-+ +-+-+
2001:db8:1001::/48|R1 | |R3 |2001:db8:3001::/48
+-+-+ +-+-+
2001:db8:1001:1:R1| |2001:db8:3001:1:R3 <- Change from Fig.1
| |
--+---+---+--
2001:db8:1001:1:EN | 2001:db8:3001:1:EN
+-+-+
|EN |
+---+
Routing Tables:
R1:
Destination Next Hop
2001:db8:1000::/36 address_of_ISP1's_router
2001:db8:2000::/36 address_of_ISP1's_router
R3:
2001:db8:3000::/36 address_of_ISP3's_router
EN:
Destination Next Hop
2001:db8:1000::/36 2001:db8:1001:1:R1
2001:db8:2000::/36 2001:db8:1001:1:R1
2001:db8:3000::/36 2001:db8:3001:1:R3
Fig.2
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Source Address Selection for IPv6 July 2007
First, mange a network such as shown in Fig. 2. Here:
- The global addresses 2001:db8:1001:R1 and 2001:db8:3001:R3 is
respectively assigned to the downstream interfaces of R1 and R3,
in addition to the link local addresses.
- Each of R1, R3 and EN keeps the traditional routing table
shown in Fig.2, respectively.
2.2 Implementation Issue
When an entry of a routing table is hit, a source address is selected
which longest-matches the next hop in the entry.
In the above example, on end node EN, when the entry
"2001:db8:2000::/36 2001:db8:1001:1:R" is hit for the destination
"2001:db8:2001::CN", the next hop becomes "2001:db8:1001::R", as a
result, the address "2001:db8:1001:1:EN" is selected, because it
longest-matches the next hop.
3. Modification to RFC3484
Before Rule 8 (Use longest matching prefix) in section 5. (Source
Address Selection) in RFC3484, the rule using longest-matching prefix
to the next hop is to be added.
4. How to distribute the routing information
Any intra-domain routing protocol can be adaptable. In order to
deliver the routing information to be used with this rule, employing
ND may not be suitable. Delivering destination and next-hop pairs
with routing protocols such as RIPng is the way to go.
5. Relations to [I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-sol]
This method is categorized into the most proactive approach in [I-
D.ietf-6man-addr-select-sol].
In order to select a precise source address for any destination at
any time, the full routing table is required to the host. This is an
unavoidable issue for all the most proactive approaches, if one of
those approaches is solely adopted. It is also the same to the issue
that in order to select the best path for any destination at any
time, the full routing table is required.
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Source Address Selection for IPv6 July 2007
6. Adaptation to a Single Router Multihomed Site.
+---+
|CN |
+-+-+
| 2001:db8:2001::CN
|
+---+---+2001:db8:2000:/36
| |
+---------+ ISP2 |
| | |
| +-------+
|
+---+---+2001:db8:1000:/36 +-------+2001:db8:3000::/36
| | | |
| ISP1 +-------------------+ ISP3 |
| | | |
+---+---+ +---+---+
| |
| |
+------------+ +------------+
2001:db8:1000:R| |2001:db8:3000:R
++-++
2001:db8:1001::/48| R |2001:db8:3001::/48
+-+-+
2001:db8:1001:1:R | 2001:db8:3001:1:R
|
2001:db8:1001:1:EN | 2001:db8:3001:1:EN
+-+-+
|EN |
+---+
Routing Tables:
R:
Destination Next Hop
2001:db8:1000::/36 address_of_ISP1's_router
2001:db8:2000::/36 address_of_ISP1's_router
2001:db8:3000::/36 address_of_ISP3's_router
EN:
Destination Next Hop
2001:db8:1000::/36 2001:db8:1001:1:R
2001:db8:2000::/36 2001:db8:1001:1:R
2001:db8:3000::/36 2001:db8:3001:1:R
Fig.3
This method is also adaptable to a single router multihomed site. In
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Source Address Selection for IPv6 July 2007
the site, the single router should be assigned multiple address
spaces, and it assigns multiple addresses to the downstream
interfaces. This is required when it has only a single downstream
interface. (see Fig. 3)
Author's Address
FUJIKAWA Kenji
ROOT Inc., Kyoto Information Laboratory
59 Minami-yonnotsubo-cho, Iwakura, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-0033, Japan
Phone: +81-3-5436-8380 (Ext. 1593)
Email: fujikawa@root-hq.com
References
[RFC3484] Draves, R., "Default Address Selection for Internet
Protocol version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 3484, February 2003.
[I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-sol]
Matsumoto, A., at el., Solution approaches for
address-selection problems,
draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-sol-00.txt (work in progress),
January 2007.
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Source Address Selection for IPv6 July 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
FUJIKAWA Expires August 25, 2008 [Page 8]
