Internet DRAFT - draft-guthery-wiegand-ip
draft-guthery-wiegand-ip
Network Working Group S. Guthery
Internet Draft HID Global
Intended status: Experimental August 21, 2008
Expires: February 21, 2009
IP and ARP over Wiegand
draft-guthery-wiegand-ip-00.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that
any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is
aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she
becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of
BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
This Internet-Draft will expire on February 21, 2009.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
Abstract
This document describes the transport of IP datagrams over the
Security Industry Association standard [3] five-conductor cable
called the Wiegand interface used for communication between card
readers and control panels in physical access control systems.
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
Conventions used in this document
In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
server respectively.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [1].
Table of Contents
1. Introduction...................................................2
2. Wiegand Physical Layer.........................................2
3. Wiegand Data Link Layer........................................3
4. IP over Wiegand................................................4
5. ICMP Messages..................................................4
6. ARP and RARP Message Format....................................4
7. Card Reader Cache..............................................5
8. Maximum Transmission Unit......................................6
9. IPv6 Considerations............................................6
10. Security Considerations.......................................6
11. IANA Considerations...........................................6
12. Conclusions...................................................6
13. Acknowledgments...............................................6
References........................................................7
13.1. Normative References.....................................7
13.2. Informative References...................................7
Author's Addresses................................................7
Intellectual Property Statement...................................8
Disclaimer of Validity............................................8
1. Introduction
This document describes the transport of IP datagrams including ARP
and ICMP messages over the five-conductor cable called the Wiegand
reader interface that is used for communication between card readers
and control panels in physical access control systems.
2. Wiegand Physical Layer
The physical and electrical properties of the five conductors on the
Wiegand reader interface are described in the Security Industry
Association standard AC-01, Access Control Standard Protocol for the
26-BIT Wiegand Reader Interface, dated October 17, 1996 [3].
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
Two of the five conductors on the Wiegand reader interface, power
(from panel to reader) and ground, do not carry communication
signals. Two of the remaining three conductors, called DATA0 and
DATA1, carry digital data from the reader to the panel using what is
known in the trade as the Wiegand Protocol. The remaining conductor,
LEDCTL, carries a high-or-low indicator from the panel to the reader.
It is used to provide access control feedback to the person, for
example turning the color of a light-emitting diode on the reader to
green to indicate that access has been granted.
Unlike most IP channels including birds and semaphores, the Wiegand
channel is asymmetric at the physical layer. Typical implementations
of the Wiegand standard block the transmission of any signal from the
panel to the reader on DATA0/DATA1 and from the reader to the panel
on LEDCTL.
The DATA0 conductor carries the 0's of a bit stream and the DATA1
conductor carries the 1's of the bit stream. DATA0 and DATA1 are
half-duplex in the sense that there is never a signal on both of
these conductors at the same time. The datalink protocol for
transmitting bit streams from the reader to the panel on DATA0 and
DATA1 is defined by AC-01.
LEDCTL is a 2-way switch. In the example usages described in AC-01,
when voltage is low a red/green LED on the reader is to be green or a
red LED is to be red. When voltage is high a red/green LED on the
reader is to be red or a red LED is to be off. Because these light
indications are intended to be observable by a human observer, the
hold times for both levels are supraliminal and thus of 10ms or more.
The use of the LEDCTL line can therefore extended by saying that any
signal from the panel to the reader on LEDCTL with a hold time of
less than 10ms SHALL interpreted a data link signal in an
asynchronous transmission protocol and not as a signal to change the
state of the LED. Further details of this protocol are described in
the following sections.
3. Wiegand Data Link Layer
TTY ("mark-and-space") bit encoding on LEDCTL with one START bit, 8
character bits and one STOP bit and no parity bit (8N1) SHALL be used
on LEDCTL.
All datalink frames SHALL be the same size.
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
SLIP packet framing within the Wiegand data link frame SHALL be used
on DATA0/DATA1 and LEDCTL.
4. IP over Wiegand
IP datagrams over Wiegand SHALL be wholly contained within one
datalink frame. IP over Wiegand does not support IP datagram
fragmentation across multiple datalink frames.
The Version field SHALL be set to 4.
The Internet Header Length field SHALL be set to 5. No IP datagram
options are supported by IP over Wiegand.
The Type of Service field SHALL be set to 0.
The Flags and Fragment Offset fields SHALL be set to 0.
The Protocol field SHALL be set to 61 ("any host internal protocol")
in the case that the data field contains a proprietary or vendor-
specific protocol packet; i.e. the packet of a protocol other than
one with an IANA Assigned Internet Protocol Number.
5. ICMP Messages
The card reader SHOULD support ECHO REQUEST.
The card reader MAY support TIMESTAMP and TIMSTAMP REPLY.
The card reader and the control panel MAY support ICMP security
failure messages (type=40) with the proviso that the message need not
be restricted to the failure of a Photuris session key management
protocol execution but rather to the execution of any security
protocol known implicitly to both the card reader and the control
panel.
6. ARP and RARP Message Format
A Wiegand network consists of a control panel together with all the
card readers that are physically connected to it. Each physical
connection is through an interface that has a 16-bit address on the
control panel. A Wiegand network is structurally similar to the
Logical IP Subnetwork (LIS) of ATM networks [9] since each of the
card readers can communicate directly with the control panel but not
with each other.
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
The Wiegand ARP/RARP protocol uses the same packet format as ARP for
Ethernet. ARP packets shall be transmitted with the assigned Wiegand
hardware type code, XX. ARP packets SHALL be accepted by a card
reader only if received with this hardware type.
ar$hrd (16 bits) SHALL contain the Wiegand specified hardware
type value, XX (decimal).
ar$pro (16 bits) SHALL contain the IP protocol code 2048
(decimal).
ar$hln (8 bits) SHALL contain 2.
ar$pln (8 bits) SHALL contain 4.
ar$op (16 bits) SHALL contain 1 for requests, 2 for responses.
ar$sha (16 bits) in requests SHALL contain the requester's
interface address. In replies it SHALL contain the target
node's interface address.
ar$spa (32 bits) in requests SHALL contain the requester's IP
address if known, otherwise zero. In replies it shall
contain the target node's IP address.
ar$tpa (32 bits) in requests SHALL contain the target's
IP address if known, otherwise zero. In replies it SHALL
contain the requester's IP address.
ar$atn (8 bits) is the octet length of following ar$uid.
ar$uid (n octets) in requests SHALL contain the requester's
unique identifier. In replies it shall contain the target
node's unique identifier.
Support for ARP and RARP by both card readers and control panels is
OPTIONAL.
7. Card Reader Cache
The default entry in the route cache of card reader contains SHOULD
be the control panel. A card reader MAY maintain a route cache that
consists of solely of this entry.
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
8. Maximum Transmission Unit
The effective upper bound on the size of a Wiegand IP datagram is not
determined by the properties of the link layer protocol but rather by
the computational capabilities of card readers. Card readers
considered in this document include those that use interrupts-off,
software UART ("bit banging") techniques for low-level input and
output. Since a card reader's primary responsibility is to respond
to the presentation of a card, time intervals during which this is
not possible SHOULD be minimized. Therefore the MTU for IP over
Wiegand is set to the maximum datagram that all hosts must be
prepared to accept, namely 576 octets.
9. IPv6 Considerations
It is desirable to be able to give each card reader and each control
panel its own static IP address in the IT infrastructure within which
the card readers and control panels are installed. Therefore it is
expected that IPv6 will be more attractive than IPv4 for physical
access control systems.
IPv6 requires that the MTU be at least 1280 octets. This requirement
exceeds the design capabilities of today's Wiegand wire
infrastructure. Therefore, this document does not foresee the use of
IPv6 in the context it has considered.
10. Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this document.
11. IANA Considerations
12. Conclusions
This document describes a realization of the Internet Protocol on the
physical, electrical and logical characteristics of the Wiegand
reader interface as described the Security Industry Association
standard AC-01, Access Control Standard Protocol for the 26-BIT
Wiegand Reader Interface, dated October 17, 1996. The realization is
backward compatible with and maintains conformance to that standard.
13. Acknowledgments
This document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot.
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
References
13.1. Normative References
[1] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3",
BCP9, RFC 2026, October 1996
[2] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[3] Security Industry Association, AC-01, Access Control Standard
Protocol for the 26-BIT Wiegand Reader Interface, October 17,
1996
[4] Braden, R. "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication
Layers", RFC 1122, October 1989
[5] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", RFC 791, USC/Information
Sciences Institute, September 1981
[6] Finlayson, R., Mann, T., Mogul, J., and M. Theimer, "A Reverse
Address Resolution Protocol", STD 38, RFC 903, Stanford, June
1984
[7] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC
1700, USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1994
[8] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", RFC-792, STD
5, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981
[9] Laubach, M. and J. Halpern, "Classical IP and ARP over ATM,"
RFC 2225, April 1998
[10] Karn, P., "ICMP Security Failures Messages," RCF 2521, March
1999
13.2. Informative References
Author's Addresses
Scott Guthery
HID Global
1320 Centre Street #201A
Newton Center, MA 02459-2497
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
Phone: +1 617 365 3059
Email: sguthery@hidcorp.com
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft IP and ARP over Wiegand August 2008
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Guthery Expires February 21, 2009 [Page 9]
